Albumblad och stycke
Violin and Piano beta difficulty
In brief

The piece unfolds as short lyrical pages for violin and piano, alternating singing melodies with more rhythmic interludes that create an intimate, slightly nostalgic salon mood. Technically, you will need to focus on Phrasing (3.5/5) by shaping the melodic line through bow distribution and subtle inner rubato, and on Vibrato (3.0/5) to keep a steady speed and amplitude that color the sound without weighing down the line. The work belongs to the composer's output of salon pieces for violin and piano, with the period not specified, and fits among his smaller character pieces for chamber performance. I do not provide a reference recording here because I cannot cite a confidently identified source.

Listen to this work

No verified recording for this work yet. We add more every week.

Sheet music

Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗

Is this the right work?
Formation

Violin and piano · 2 performers

Required forces
Violin 1 performers
Piano 1 performers
Playable parts
Violin Piano
MusicCoach difficulty
48/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 36–60/100
Confidence : 18% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 5

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
Among Jacob Adolf Hägg
42%
Era
Genre
Estimated skills
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
Style
Romantic style
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Tone
Vibrato
1
Technique
Intonation
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression