Adagio et Rondo, Op.40
Violin and Piano beta difficulty
In brief

This short work for violin and piano shifts from a meditative Adagio to a lively Rondo: the mood moves from an intimate cantabile, requiring the bow to sing without pressure, to brisk episodes needing lightness and forward energy. Technically, Phrasing (4.0/5) here requires precise bow direction and subtle breathing to connect lines without breaking them, and Rapid Passages (3.5/5) call for secure fingering changes and tight right/left hand coordination to maintain clarity and rhythmic steadiness. The score is presented as a salon piece for violin and piano (Op.40) within Baillot's output; the period is listed as unknown in the provided details, though the work fits his duo writing. I do not provide a reference recording because I am not 100% certain of a widely recognized interpretation for this specific piece.

Listen to this work

No verified recording for this work yet. We add more every week.

Sheet music

Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗

Is this the right work?
Formation

Violin and piano · 2 performers

Required forces
Violin 1 performers
Piano 1 performers
Playable parts
Violin Piano
MusicCoach difficulty
58/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 46–70/100
Confidence : 19% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 6 to 7

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
67%
Among Pierre Baillot
70%
Era
Genre
Estimated skills
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
Style
Classical style
1
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression