These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — Ludwig van Beethoven - Waltz in D Major, WoO 85 · Score Videos (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work? -
Play — Beethoven: Waltz in D Major, WoO 85 · Ludwig van Beethoven, Doomin Kim (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗
Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This Waltz in D major feels sprightly and danceable, yet it often relies on small rubatos and expressive surges that give it an intimate, song-like quality rather than mere salon divertissement. Technically, you will need to focus on Tempo rubato (3.9/5) — making subtle local time adjustments while keeping an underlying steady pulse — and on Phrasing (3.9/5), which requires shaping lines with controlled dynamic and touch changes so the melody breathes. The piece sits in the Romantic period and is listed among the short, salon-style works in the composer's WoO (works without opus) catalogue, intended for domestic performance. I do not suggest a reference recording here, as I cannot be certain of a single authoritative interpretation for this specific piece.