Cello Sonata, op. 11, no. 3 (second version): II. Lansam-sehr Lebhaft
Modern Sonata Cello and Piano
In brief

The II. movement, “Lansam–sehr Lebhaft,” mixes a held-back, introspective line with sudden, sharp responses, giving a mood that is restrained yet restless and rhythmically alert. Practically, you will need to focus on Legato d'archet (violoncelle) (3.6/5) to keep long phrases connected across string crossings and shifts of weight, and on negotiating the Polyrhythmie 2 contre 3 (3.1/5) by refining the wrist motion and coordinating hands so the two layers stay clear. The sonata comes from Hindemith's modern period and, as this is the second version of his op. 11 no. 3, it shows his tendency in chamber works to recast textures and sharpen contrapuntal clarity within his catalogue. I do not give a specific recording recommendation here out of caution regarding the accuracy of particular references.

Formation

Cello and piano · 2 performers

Required forces
Cello 1 performers
Piano 1 performers
Playable parts
Cello Piano
MusicCoach difficulty
59/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 39–78/100
Confidence : 42% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 6 to 7

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
MusicCoach consensus
uncertain
Relative difficulty
61%
Among Paul Hindemith
30%
Era Modern
24%
Genre
Estimated skills
Technique
Bow legato (cello)
1
Rhythm
Polyrhythm 2 against 3
1
Style
Modern and contemporary style
1
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Tone
Vibrato (cello)
1
Technique
Position changes (cello)
2
Tone
Touch control
1
Technique
Intonation (cello)
2
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Technique
Fast passages
2
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
Technique
General technique
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression