Sonata for Violin and Piano in D major, op. 25: III. Allegro molto vivace – Più mosso
Romantic Sonata Violin and Piano
In brief

The third movement feels like buoyant, incisive cheerfulness, alternating skipping figures and brilliant runs that demand crisp articulation and rhythmic drive. Technically, you will need to work especially on Legato bowing (3.6/5) — here that means maintaining smooth connections across string changes and large right-hand shifts without breaking the line — and, to a lesser extent, Tempo rubato (3.1/5) to allow slight expressive flexibility without upsetting the balance with the piano. This sonata is part of Goldmark's Romantic chamber output, reflecting his taste for singing melody and virtuosic character in works for violin and piano. I do not give a reference recording because I am not 100% certain of a single widely recognized interpretation for this specific movement.

Formation

Violin and piano · 2 performers

Required forces
Violin 1 performers
Piano 1 performers
Playable parts
Violin Piano
MusicCoach difficulty
63/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 56–71/100
Confidence : 42% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 7

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
81%
Among Karl Goldmark
44%
Era Romantic
56%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Technique
Bow legato
1
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Tone
Vibrato
1
Style
Romantic style
2
Style
Character and style
1
Technique
Position changes
1
Technique
Intonation
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
Rhythm
Complex bowing rhythm
1
Technique
General technique
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression