Sonata for Cello and Piano No. 2 in F Major, Op. 99
Sonata Cello and Piano
In brief

The piece alternates lyrical, warm episodes with more lively, rhythmically driven sections, creating the feel of an intense conversation between cello and piano rather than mere accompaniment. On the technical side, you will face Complex Fingering (2.5/5) requiring precise shifts, position changes and finger planning to maintain pitch across extended lines, and attention to Phrasing (2.5/5) that means shaping each phrase as a continuous breath to connect motifs and control tone production. This Cello and Piano Sonata in F major, Op. 99, is the composer's second cello sonata and belongs to his mature chamber-music output.

Formation

Cello and piano · 2 performers

Required forces
Cello 1 performers
Piano 1 performers
Playable parts
Cello Piano
MusicCoach difficulty
70/100
Advanced
Likely range : 58–82/100
Confidence : 39% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 7 to 8

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
41%
Among Johannes Brahms
81%
Era
62%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Style
Character and style
1
Technique
Position changes (cello)
1
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Fingering
Complex fingering
1
Technique
Intonation (cello)
1
Technique
Bow legato (cello)
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
Style
Classical style
1
Style
Romantic style
1
Technique
General technique
1
Technique
Bow hold (cello)
1
Tone
Vibrato (cello)
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression