Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This solo piano piece has a conspiratorial, playful character, with motifs that promise resolution and then withhold it, producing a sense of intimate trickery rather than grand drama. You will need to focus specifically on Phrasing (2.5/5): here that means shaping short melodic lines so each little “deception” is audible by connecting pivot tones smoothly without breaking continuity; and Dynamics (Nuances) (2.5/5) require fine dynamic control to make micro-accents and phrase folds perceptible without forcing. With no precise period indicated, it should be regarded among Schubert’s lyrical, characterful piano pieces rather than his large-scale symphonic or vocal works, contributing to the salon and miniatures in his output. I do not provide a reference recording here, as I cannot be certain of a widely recognized performance for this specific work.