Sonata for Piano
Sonata Piano solo 15 min
In brief

The sonata projects a taut, restless character, shifting between percussive, motoric figures and more open passages where lines emerge sharply, relying on rhythmic jolts rather than long lyrical cantilenas. Technically, focus on Passages rapides (2.5/5) — these are short fast runs requiring precise fingering and a compact wrist action to maintain clarity — and on Technique générale (2.5/5), which here means steady dynamic control and reliable articulation when hand positions are awkward or changing. The period is listed as unknown, but it is a piano sonata for solo keyboard that belongs to the composer’s piano output and reflects his engagement with modern textures within the sonata genre. I do not have a specific, confidently identifiable reference recording to recommend for this exact work.

MusicCoach difficulty
74/100
Advanced
Likely range : 62–86/100
Confidence : 32% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 8

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
94%
Among Kalevi Aho
90%
Era
84%
Genre
Movements and pieces of this work

One rarely plays the whole work. We do not yet have a level specific to each of these movements: they carry the opus's level, which does not say which one is the most approachable.

Estimated skills
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Style
Character and style
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
Technique
General technique
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression