Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This movement feels playful and pastoral, built from alternating motifs that create the impression of small chases and witty dialogues between the hands; the overall mood is clear and light rather than dramatic. You will need to work on Connaissance des formes (3.6/5) to sense and shape the returns and episodes of the rondo/ternary layout — this means preparing repeats mentally and adjusting phrase shaping and energy on each recurrence — and pay attention to Nuances (2.5/5) by controlling subtle expressive shifts (slight lightening, very localized dynamic inflections, and precise control of finger legato/detaché). The piece belongs to the Classical period and stands among Mozart's more mature piano sonatas, showing a more autonomous and refined piano writing within his output. I do not provide a reference interpretation here because I cannot be absolutely certain of a specific, widely recognized recording for this movement.