Sonate no 28 op. 101 : I. Etwas lebhaft
Romantic Sonata Piano solo
In brief

The first movement feels alert and allusive rather than grand: short motifs answer each other, accents shift unexpectedly, and the overall impression is of contained forward motion. Connaissance des formes (3.6/5): you will need to identify and shape the small thematic units and their returns to clarify the contrasting episodes; Tempo rubato (3.1/5): the physical requirement is a controlled rubato, slightly stretching phrases while the left hand preserves an underlying pulse. Listed as Romantic in your data, this sonata sits relatively late in Beethoven's sonata output and shows the move toward more introspective, modulatory writing.

Listen to this work

These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.

An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.

  • Play — Beethoven: Piano Sonata No. 28 in A Major, Op. 101: I. Etwas lebhaft und mit der innigsten... · Emil Gilels - Topic (the player loads on click)

    Open on Youtube ↗

    Is this the right work?

No account is required and no personal data is collected.

MusicCoach difficulty
78/100
Advanced
Likely range : 67–89/100
Confidence : 43% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 8

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
90%
Among Ludwig van Beethoven
90%
Era Romantic
90%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Pedaling
Sustain pedal
1
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Style
Romantic style
2
Style
Character and style
1
Pedaling
Half-pedalling
1
Technique
Hand independence
2
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
Rhythm
General rhythm
1
Rhythm
Syncopation
1
Technique
General technique
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression