Kinderszenen op. 15 : Kuriose Geschichte
Piano solo
In brief

Kuriose Geschichte is a short ironic, capricious tableau that reads like a little spoken exchange, with abrupt gestures, suggested silences and accents that behave more like rhetoric than an extended singing line. The main technical challenges for you will be Phrasé (2.5/5) — here that means shaping very short melodic units through breathing-like releases and subtle wrist/arm adjustments so the little replies and hesitations speak — and Nuances (2.5/5), which require very fine control of very soft to soft dynamics and isolated accents by slight changes of finger weight without breaking the line. Within Schumann's output this piece belongs to a collection of piano miniatures intended as intimate, complementary scenes rather than extended developmental works. I do not give a reference interpretation here because I am not fully certain of a single definitive recording for this specific movement.

Listen to this work

These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.

An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.

  • Play — Schumann - Kinderszenen Op.15, No. 2 - Kuriose Geschichte (A Curious Story) | Piano with Sheet · Stanislav Stanchev (the player loads on click)

    Open on Youtube ↗

    Is this the right work?
  • Play — Schumann: Kinderszenen, Op. 15: II. Kuriose Geschichte · Robert Schumann, Arcadi Volodos (the player loads on click)

    Open on Spotify ↗

    Is this the right work?

No account is required and no personal data is collected.

MusicCoach difficulty
41/100
Elementary
Likely range : 34–48/100
Confidence : 45% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 4 to 5

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
MusicCoach expertise
45
45/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
37%
Among Robert Schumann
35%
Era
Genre
Estimated skills
Style
Character and style
1
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
2
Interpretation
Phrasing
2
Technique
Staccato
1
Style
Romantic style
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression