Rondo in B flat major, H.267, Wq.58, no. 5
Classical Rondo Piano solo ~4 min
In brief

This Rondo in B-flat sounds playful and sprightly, with contrasting episodes that require forward momentum and crisp articulation to highlight the theme's rhythmic turn. The skill “Connaissance des formes (3.1/5)” here means clearly identifying and shaping the returns of the refrain and the contrasting episodes so repetition feels balanced with novelty; the skill “Style classique (3.1/5)” requires a restrained, detached approach, controlling attacks and legato to preserve clarity in the texture. The piece belongs to C.P.E. Bach's Classical-period keyboard output and sits among his lighter salon pieces for piano rather than his larger, more dramatic works. I do not give a reference recording, being cautious not to cite a specific interpretation unless I am certain it is widely recognized for this exact work.

MusicCoach difficulty
52/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 40–64/100
Confidence : 35% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 5 to 6

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
67%
Among Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach
68%
Era Classical
28%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Style
Classical style
1
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression