No. 4 from "Traumbilder" op. 79,4
Piano solo
In brief

This No. 4 from Traumbilder op. 79 unfolds a contemplative, slightly dreamlike atmosphere, with resonant textures that call for inward listening rather than flashy virtuosity. Technically, the piece asks you to work on Phrasing (2.5/5) to connect and shape long melodic lines without smothering them, on Dynamics (2.5/5) to render subtle rises and falls, and on Sustain Pedal (2.5/5) which requires precise timing of depressions and releases to keep harmonic clarity. The piece belongs to the set titled Traumbilder (op. 79) and is one number within that cycle for piano; the exact period is noted as unknown. I do not have a confidently identifiable reference recording to recommend for this specific piece.

MusicCoach difficulty
49/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 43–54/100
Confidence : 55% · fair confidence
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 5 to 6

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
Henle Verlag
4
38/100 normalised
Henle Verlag
5
50/100 normalised
Henle Verlag
6
62/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
54%
Among Niels Wilhelm Gade
50%
Era
Genre
Estimated skills
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Pedaling
Sustain pedal
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression