12 Piano Variations on the Romance "Je suis Lindor" K. 354 (299a)
VariationsRomance Piano solo 12 min
In brief

This set of variations on the romance “Je suis Lindor” has a singing, conversational character, alternating lyrical tunes with livelier episodes where the right hand pursues melodic drive while the left supplies a defining harmonic undercurrent. As for technical challenges, Analysis harmonique (3.8/5) will require you to spot and anticipate rapid harmonic shifts to shape pedaling and attacks, and Connaissance des formes (3.8/5) requires understanding the variations’ logic so you can connect transitions without losing the musical thread; in practice these skills mean precise hand shifts and carefully matched phrase endings to keep continuity. The piece occupies a place in Mozart’s piano variations output, combining melodic gift with salon virtuosity and belonging to the Classical keyboard repertoire. I do not give a reference recording here because I am not 100% certain of a specific definitive performance to recommend.

MusicCoach difficulty
54/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 39–70/100
Confidence : 57% · fair confidence
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 6

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
Henle Verlag
6
62/100 normalised · 2 obs.
Relative difficulty
64%
Among Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
61%
Era
38%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Style
Classical style
1
Reading
Reading accidentals
1
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
2
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression