Fantasia and Fugue in C minor, Wq.119, no. 7
Classical FugueFantasia Piano solo ~7 min
In brief

The Fantasia and Fugue in C minor has a dark, restless character: the fantasia unfolds in dramatic, improvisatory stretches that give way to a tightly argued fugue of episodes and contrapuntal responses. You will need to focus on Analysis harmonique (4.4/5) to anticipate and smooth quick modulations — this means identifying inversions and appoggiaturas so your hands prepare resolutions cleanly and avoid awkward overlaps — and on Polyphony for three or more voices (4.4/5) to preserve voice independence, which requires precise fingering distributions, differentiated dynamics and sometimes hand shifts to keep each line clear. From the Classical period, the piece reflects C.P.E. Bach's interest in expressive freedom combined with contrapuntal complexity, a distinctive facet of his keyboard works.

MusicCoach difficulty
75/100
Advanced
Likely range : 63–87/100
Confidence : 40% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 8

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
100%
Among Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach
100%
Era Classical
82%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Technique
Three-or-more-voice polyphony
2
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Style
Classical style
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression