Andante in F major, H.250, Wq.116, no. 24
Classical Piano solo ~4 min
In brief

This Andante in F major has a measured, conversational calm, with a private dialogue between the melodic right hand and its accompaniment rather than a grand, expansive gesture, so clarity of small motifs is important. You should focus on Connaissance des formes (3.1/5) to identify and shape reprises and internal contrasts — here that means planning your gestures to highlight returns and digressions without breaking the flow — and on Phrasé (2.5/5), which calls for subtle connections and softened attacks in short phrases to convey musical direction. The piece belongs to the Classical period and sits within C. P. E. Bach’s keyboard output, reflecting the balance of intimate expressivity and formal clarity typical of his work.

MusicCoach difficulty
35/100
Elementary
Likely range : 23–47/100
Confidence : 35% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 3 to 4

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
11%
Among Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach
12%
Era Classical
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Style
Classical style
1
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression