Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This Dumka in C minor unfolds a mix of Russian melancholy and passionate outbursts, alternating singing episodes with agitated passages that require maintaining a dramatic breath; you often feel a sombre nostalgia that surfaces in short phrases then flares into nervous accents. Technically, pay attention to Tempo rubato (3.1/5) which here requires small, controlled temporal fluctuations to highlight the singing motifs without upsetting the metric returns, and to the Sustain pedal (Pédale de sustain, 3.1/5) where you must balance resonance to achieve a Romantic sonority without blurring harmonic textures; these gestures call for close listening and timely finger release at harmonic changes. From the Romantic period, it occupies a role as a character piece in Tchaikovsky's piano output, showcasing his taste for expressive color and strong contrasts.