Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
The piece sounds bright and lively, with dialoguing passages between soloist and continuo that alternate singing lines and brisk virtuosic figures, often on a dance-like pulse. You will face specifically Ornements baroque (3.1/5), which here demand short, clean grace-notes (trills/mordents and appoggiaturas) executed with precise fingering and controlled bow articulation, and Lecture clé de fa (3.1/5), since you must read and follow occasional bass/tenor-clef lines in the continuo or lower parts to align intonation and entrances; these require punctual eye-shifts and adaptive phrasing. From a contextual point of view, the work belongs to the Baroque era and reflects the Italian concerto tradition, illustrating Tartini’s focus on the violin as a solo instrument within his output. I do not provide a reference interpretation here because I am not fully confident about naming a specific recording for this exact work.