3 Myths, for violin and piano, op. 30
Romantic Violin and Piano
In brief

These three “Myths” call for a sensual, nocturnal atmosphere in which the violin’s melodic line unfolds in long, singing phrases over a piano part that is sometimes shimmering and sometimes percussive. Technically, focus is required on Style romantique (3.1/5) — on the violin this means sustaining tone and shaping dynamics across extended lines, and on the piano balancing voicing and pedal so as not to obscure the soloist; additionally Tempo rubato (3.1/5) demands measured flexibility between the players, with subtle pushes and pulls communicated constantly so the forward motion remains cohesive. The set belongs to Szymanowski’s later/romantic-leaning output and showcases his lyrical language and interest in orchestral color adapted for violin and piano.

Listen to this work

No verified recording for this work yet. We add more every week.

Sheet music

Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗

Is this the right work?
Formation

Violin and piano · 2 performers

Required forces
Violin 1 performers
Piano 1 performers
Playable parts
Violin Piano
MusicCoach difficulty
83/100
Master repertoire
Likely range : 76–90/100
Confidence : 47% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 8

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
MusicCoach expertise
85
85/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
96%
Among Karol Szymanowski
95%
Era Romantic
Genre
Estimated skills
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Style
Romantic style
2
Style
Character and style
1
Technique
Position changes
1
Technique
Harmonics
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
Tone
Vibrato
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

Ambitious challenge

A useful leap with guided practice.

No suggestion yet.

See the whole progression