The New Doll Op.39 No.9
Piano solo ~2 min
In brief

This short piece feels like a little scene played by a new doll: a playful motif with a faintly wistful undertone that alternates between sprightly figures and more singing moments, creating a sense of mechanical motion softened by lyricism. Technically, Phrasing (2.5/5) will require shaping very short melodic ideas by controlling dynamics and note endings so the “voice” stays clear, and Legato (2.5/5) calls for precise finger contact and coordinated hand–wrist action to connect notes without forcing a broad touch. It is a piano miniature belonging to the composer’s body of short, domestic pieces for solo piano, aimed at expressive nuance on a small scale rather than grand virtuosity. I do not provide a performance reference because I am not fully certain of a single authoritative recording for this specific piece.

MusicCoach difficulty
18/100
Beginner
Likely range : 14–23/100
Confidence : 69% · fair confidence
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
On the syllabus: Grade 2 ABRSM

Official level, taken from the exam syllabus.

Other syllabi : RCM Grade 2

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
Combined exam syllabi
Grade 2
18/100 normalised
ABRSM (syllabus)
Grade 2
20/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
2%
Among Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky
8%
Era
Genre
Estimated skills
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression