Allegro appassionato in B minor, for cello and piano, op. 43
Romantic Cello and Piano
In brief

The Allegro appassionato in B minor presents itself as a fiery, singing piece, alternating sustained lyrical lines with dramatic surges that release abruptly before resuming. You will face specifically the Style romantique (3.1/5), which here requires broad phrasing, sustained legato and subtle tonal inflections to make the cello “sing,” and Tempo rubato (3.1/5), which calls for measured temporal freedom while maintaining an internal pulse and precise coordination with the pianist. The work belongs to the Romantic period and sits among Saint‑Saëns's chamber and concert pieces that exploit the cello's color and virtuosity within a clear, elegant writing style. I do not provide a recording reference here out of caution, since I prefer not to name performers unless I am fully certain they are widely recognized for this exact work.

Listen to this work

No verified recording for this work yet. We add more every week.

Sheet music

Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗

Is this the right work?
Formation

Cello and piano · 2 performers

Required forces
Cello 1 performers
Piano 1 performers
Playable parts
Cello Piano
MusicCoach difficulty
49/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 26–71/100
Confidence : 60% · fair confidence
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 5 to 6

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
Henle Verlag
3
28/100 normalised
MusicCoach expertise
62
62/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
22%
Among Camille Saint-Saëns
17%
Era Romantic
Genre
Estimated skills
Style
Romantic style
1
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Technique
Legato
1
Technique
Bow legato (cello)
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
2
Technique
Fast passages
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
2
Tone
Vibrato (cello)
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression