Suite in F for Violin and Piano, op. 93, "Im alten Stil"
Romantic Suite Violin and Piano
In brief

This Suite in F has an “old-style” character where the dances are sculpted with contrapuntal clarity and crisp articulation rather than expansive Romantic gestures, so you should aim for precise line and polyphonic continuity. You will need to rely on your Knowledge of forms (4.1/5) to shape repeats and dance lines—this means planning transitions, balancing phrase endings and maintaining formal tension—and on Baroque ornaments (4.1/5), which require short, controlled executions (appoggiaturas, mordents) and coordinated left-hand/finger work for the violin together with clear right-hand diction at the piano. Stylistically the work belongs to Reger's neo-baroque treatments within the Romantic era, where older dance forms are reworked with late-Romantic harmonic density. I do not give specific reference recordings here; if you wish, we can look for well-regarded performances together.

Listen to this work

No verified recording for this work yet. We add more every week.

Sheet music

Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗

Is this the right work?
Formation

Violin and piano · 2 performers

Required forces
Violin 1 performers
Piano 1 performers
Playable parts
Violin Piano
MusicCoach difficulty
68/100
Advanced
Likely range : 61–74/100
Confidence : 43% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 7

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
MusicCoach expertise
65
65/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
45%
Among Max Reger
56%
Era Romantic
74%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Ornaments
Baroque ornaments
2
Style
Baroque style
2
Style
Romantic style
1
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
Technique
General technique
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression