Sonata, for cello and piano no. 2 in G minor, op. 28
Romantic Sonata Cello and Piano
In brief

This cello and piano sonata in G minor has a tense, introspective character, alternating long lyrical lines with more agitated, nervy passages and sharp syncopations. Technically, you will need to focus on Connaissance des formes (3.6/5) to handle repeats and thematic transitions so the long phrases remain coherent, and on Legato d'archet (violoncelle) (3.6/5) to sustain a homogeneous tone across extended melodic arcs — concretely that means smoothing bow changes and adjusting bow pressure to keep the sound unified. The work belongs to the Romantic period and represents one of the composer's early contributions to the cello-and-piano sonata repertoire, showing his dense, contrapuntal approach of that phase.

Listen to this work

No verified recording for this work yet. We add more every week.

Sheet music

Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗

Is this the right work?
Formation

Cello and piano · 2 performers

Required forces
Cello 1 performers
Piano 1 performers
Playable parts
Cello Piano
MusicCoach difficulty
74/100
Advanced
Likely range : 66–81/100
Confidence : 47% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 8

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
MusicCoach expertise
72
72/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
75%
Among Max Reger
87%
Era Romantic
79%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Tone
Vibrato (cello)
1
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Technique
Bow legato (cello)
2
Style
Romantic style
2
Technique
Position changes (cello)
1
Fingering
Complex fingering
1
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
2
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression