Piano Sonata no. 2, op. 64, "The Fire Sermon"
Sonata Piano solo ~22 min
In brief

This Piano Sonata titled “The Fire Sermon” projects a tense, obsessive character, built from repetitive motifs and sudden rhythmic outbursts that demand attention to dynamic contrast and phrase-level breathing. Technically, the Analysis of harmony (3.6/5) requires you to track sometimes fleeting harmonic progressions to shape accents and color shifts, and Knowledge of forms (3.6/5) asks you to clearly delineate large formal sections to articulate repeats and transitions — which translates into hand-balance choices and anticipating cadences. The piece appears in Rautavaara's piano output under the indicated opus and stands as a modern sonata within his keyboard works. I do not give a reference interpretation here, as I am not fully certain of a specific definitive recording for this work.

MusicCoach difficulty
55/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 43–67/100
Confidence : 35% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 6

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
67%
Among Einojuhani Rautavaara
63%
Era
38%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Theory
Harmonic analysis
2
Ornaments
Romantic ornaments
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression