These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — J. S. Bach: Lob sei dem allmächtigen Gott BWV 704. Henrik Berg, organ. · Henrik Berg - pianorganist (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work? -
Play — Fughetta super "Lob sei dem allmächtigen Gott", BWV 704 · Johann Sebastian Bach, André Isoir (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗
Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This chorale unfolds with measured solemnity and contrapuntal clarity: the lines feel like liturgical discourse, calling for crisp articulation and restrained gravity rather than expansive lyricism. Technically, two items stand out: Bass-clef reading (Lecture clé de fa, 3.1/5) requires secure reading of the lower register to keep the left hand independent and the bass line accurate, and Baroque ornaments (Ornements baroque, 3.1/5) demand short, precise executions of mordents and grace notes that must sit within the contrapuntal flow without lengthening phrases. The piece belongs to Bach’s body of chorale harmonizations typical of the Baroque church repertoire, where voice-leading and clarity outweigh pianistic showmanship. I do not provide a reference interpretation here because I am not 100% certain of a specific recording for this work.