Magnificat Fugue, for organ in tone 5, no. 9, T. 161
Baroque Fugue Piano solo ~2 min
In brief

This Magnificat Fugue is brisk and contrapuntal: entries are crisp and demand clear articulation rather than sustained lyricism, producing a tightly woven, energetic polyphonic texture. You will chiefly face challenges in Harmonic analysis (4.4/5) — you must quickly trace key relationships and cadences to anticipate entries and adjust registration — and in Polyphony for three voices or more (4.4/5) — the task is to keep each line audible and independent through specific fingerings and differentiated phrasing between the hands (and pedal if used). The piece belongs to the Baroque organ repertoire associated with Pachelbel's settings for the Magnificat, written for liturgical use and contrapuntal practice. I do not give a reference recording here out of caution unless I can identify one with certainty.

MusicCoach difficulty
55/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 43–67/100
Confidence : 35% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 6

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
68%
Among Johann Pachelbel
51%
Era Baroque
19%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Technique
Three-or-more-voice polyphony
2
Reading
Bass clef reading
1
Ornaments
Baroque ornaments
1
Style
Baroque style
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression