Fugue in A minor, T.284
Baroque Fugue Piano solo ~2 min
In brief

The Fugue in A minor has a contained, inexorable character: regular subject entries and counter-subjects create a steady, driving tension rather than sudden displays of virtuosity. You will be specifically challenged on Analysis harmonique (4.4/5) — you must quickly identify modulatory progressions to anticipate transitions and voice resolutions — and on Polyphony for three or more voices (4.4/5) — this requires precise balance among soprano, alto and bass lines, independent fingering to keep contrapuntal lines distinct, and the ability to bring out the subject while supporting the inner voices. As a Baroque keyboard fugue, it belongs to Pachelbel’s contrapuntal output typical of didactic and liturgical pieces of the period. I do not give a reference recording here because I am not fully certain of a single widely recognized performance for this exact fugue.

MusicCoach difficulty
50/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 38–62/100
Confidence : 40% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 5 to 6

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
59%
Among Johann Pachelbel
38%
Era Baroque
9%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Technique
Three-or-more-voice polyphony
1
Reading
Bass clef reading
1
Ornaments
Baroque ornaments
1
Style
Baroque style
1
Technique
Hand independence
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Technique
Two-voice polyphony
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression