10 Magnificat Fugues in the Second Tone, T.124-133
Baroque Fugue Piano solo ~22 min
In brief

These Magnificat fugues in the second tone present a clear contrapuntal, measured character, alternating singing subjects with more rhythmically reduced passages that require keeping a supportive bass line while highlighting inner voices. You will specifically need to work on Lecture clé de fa (3.1/5) to read the left hand fluently and preserve the independence of counter-subjects, and on Ornements baroque (3.1/5) where short ornaments demand quick, precise fingering (short trills/mordents) integrated into the line without breaking the rhythmic flow. The piece belongs to the Baroque period and is part of Pachelbel's contrapuntal output intended to accompany the Magnificat and to practice polyphonic keyboard technique. I do not give a reference performance here because I prefer not to risk naming an inaccurate recording.

MusicCoach difficulty
40/100
Elementary
Likely range : 28–52/100
Confidence : 35% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 4

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
29%
Among Johann Pachelbel
14%
Era Baroque
3%
Genre
Estimated skills
Reading
Bass clef reading
1
Ornaments
Baroque ornaments
1
Style
Baroque style
1
Sight-reading
Sight-reading
1
Pedaling
Sustain pedal
1
Technique
Three-or-more-voice polyphony
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression