These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — 3 Pièces pour piano op. 59 · hppiano1 (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work? -
Play — 3 Klaverstykker op. 59 · atsusiueno (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work? -
Play — 3 Piano Pieces, Op. 59, FS 131: No. 1, Impromptu (Arr. For orchestra) · Carl Nielsen, London Sinfonietta, Elgar Howarth (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗
Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
These three short piano pieces convey a nocturne-like mood with alternating lyrical, singing lines and brief moments of wry character that require close attention to micro-expressive detail. Technically, you will mainly face Tempo rubato (3.1/5), which here calls for small controlled tempo shifts achieved by flexible, measured wrist and finger adjustments to preserve the underlying pulse, and Pedal de sustain (3.1/5), where precise pedal changes are needed to blend harmonies without blurring separate voices. Written in the composer’s Romantic period, these pieces occupy a somewhat singular place in his piano output because of their concision and focus on mood rather than virtuosic display. I do not provide a reference interpretation here because I am not 100% certain of a single widely recognized recording for these specific pieces.