Violin and piano · 2 performers
Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
The work has an intimate celebratory character, combining a lyrical cantilena for the violin with often choral piano accompaniments and occasional virtuosic flourishes that read as festive exclamations. Technically, you will need to address the Style romantique (3.1/5) — here that means broad phrasing, expressive holds and releases, and sustained legato that require careful bow control and breath‑like shaping — and the Tempo rubato (3.1/5), practicing measured rhythmic flexibility, i.e. small tempo adjustments that enhance the melody without destabilizing the accompaniment. It belongs to the Romantic period and sits among Liszt's more occasional/salon works for violin and piano, not at the center of his major piano corpus but expressive of his taste for vocal‑like writing. I do not provide a recommended recording because I am not fully certain of a single authoritative interpretation for this specific piece.