Amusement in F major, for violin and piano, op. 108, "Sonatine"
Romantic Sonatina Violin and Piano
In brief

Hummel's Sonatine in F comes across as a bright, playful piece with clear melodic lines and quick exchanges between violin and piano that demand crisp articulation rather than overt Romantic drama. Technically, note the skill « Connaissance des formes (3.8/5) » because you must map phrases and repeats to manage balance and transitions, and « Tempo rubato (3.1/5) » which here requires tasteful slight stretching of phrases without upsetting the accompaniment; for the violin this means small lengthenings of tied notes and very attentive entries to match the piano. The work belongs to the pedagogical, salon-oriented side of the Romantic period, intended as useful material for teaching and for domestic performance rather than as a large-scale concert work. I do not provide a recommended recording because I am not fully certain of a single widely recognized reference for this specific piece.

Listen to this work

No verified recording for this work yet. We add more every week.

Sheet music

Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗

Is this the right work?
Formation

Violin and piano · 2 performers

Required forces
Violin 1 performers
Piano 1 performers
Playable parts
Violin Piano
MusicCoach difficulty
47/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 36–57/100
Confidence : 47% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 5

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
MusicCoach expertise
55
55/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
10%
Among Johann Nepomuk Hummel
6%
Era Romantic
56%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Style
Classical style
1
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Style
Romantic style
2
Technique
Intonation
1
Technique
Legato
2
Interpretation
Phrasing
2
Rhythm
General rhythm
1
Technique
General technique
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression